First published in Clach A’
Choilich, Volume 2, Number 2.
1976
Before the MacThomases
- Some Aspects of Early Prehistoric
Tayside
Lisbeth M.
Thoms.
Most of
the people who came to the annual Clan Gathering in Glenshee
last August [1975] must like me, have travelled through part
of the central industrial belt of Tayside in order to get
there. All over central Scotland the evidence of human
activity looms larger and larger on the landscape, and one
needs a very good imagination to wipe all that out and picture
the scene when Man first set foot in the region some seven
thousand years ago. The background in which we must place the
first peoples on Tayside is one of dense deciduous forests
supporting a wide variety of wild animals; Man, like all other
mammals, existed in a reciprocal relationship with the natural
environment to which he also was adequately adapted. This is a
picture more easily conjured up when standing in Glenshee a
heart of “MacThomas country”, where the magnificence of the
scenery and the natural elements seem still to dominate human
life.
Tayside’s first human inhabitants belong
archaeologically to the Mesolithic or Middle Stone Age period,
and it is estimated that their numbers would not be much in
excess of a couple of hundred. The most detailed impression
that we have of Mesolithic inhabitants comes from the
excavation of an archaeological site at Morton farm near
Tayport, Fife. The economy was a hunting and gathering one,
based on trapping game in the inland forest areas and fishing
and collecting shell-fish from the coast. The debris from the
middens, which were excavated at the site reflect the wide
variety of mammals, birds, fish, and shellfish which was
caught and collected. Evidence of dwellings and open hearths
was discovered, the dwellings being little more than lean-to
type structures consisting of a framework of branches probably
covered with foliage or skins. Working-floors found near the
dwellings were littered with a variety of stone tools plus
waste flakes and rejects. Pebble flint was the most common
type of stone used. Small polished flints could be set with
resin into wooden shafts and perhaps bound with fibrous twine
to make an arrow or spear tip. Several flints carefully placed
in a shaft would make an effective harpoon. Nonetheless, it is
significant that at this period Man had little or no effect on
his environment but was ruled by it, though a high degree of
skill was attained in utilizing various natural resources. The
fight for survival, however, must have been a full-time
occupation.
Around 4000 BC, new settlers arrived in Scotland
bringing with them such revolutionary practices as the
cultivation of cereals, the domestication of animals, and the
production of pottery. This was the first step forward by Man
towards the control of the natural environment in this
region.
On Tayside, areas with light soils and a thin forest
cover were probably cleared by the earliest farmers, using
stone axes, before turning over the soil with a digging stick
and then sowing the crop. The ability to produce a surplus of
foodstuffs resulted in larger groups of people being supported
and a more settled way of life being adopted.
The most enduring monuments of the Neolithic farmers
are the large tombs which they erected for the communal burial
of the dead. On the fringe of the Tayside region, two such
monuments of the type known as earthen long barrows have been
identified in recent years, both in south Kincardineshire: one
at Dalladies, the other at Capo. At Dalladies, excavation of
the site revealed evidence of a rectangular “mortuary house”
constructed of timber and stone, built to receive a number of
bodies before a large mound was heaped on top. Before
excavation, the mound at Dalladies was wedge- shaped and
measured 65m in length, was 18m wide at the east end and 9m
wide at the west end. Excavation showed the mound to have been
built entirely of turf and top soil.
With these monuments we are dealing with a formally
expressed architectural solution to the problem of funerary
ritual, and in such the portrayal of command and organisation
of labour beyond that possible of just a family group. We can
envisage for the Neolithic period as a whole a more settled
and complex society, with respect, order, and perhaps
hierarchy expressed in the construction of the burial
monuments. Indeed,we might attribute to the Neolithic period
the beginnings of the Clan system which was to become so
important in Scotland thousands of years later!
So far, we have been dealing with peoples capable only
of a stone technology, but of course one of the most important
stages in Man’s mastery of natural resources was the discovery
and use of metals. This demanded an entirely new complex of
technological innovations, and involved the development of new
s k ills and new habits on the part of those who had
previously worked only in natural substances in their raw
state. The technological step of entering the Bronze Age
results in the break from more or less self-sufficiency to the
rise of skilled specialists (to prospect for ores and to smelt
metals) and a new artisan class within the social structure.
The first people to arrive on Tayside with a knowledge of the
use of metals are known as the Beaker people because of their
custom of interring a distinctive type of pottery with the
dead. These people arrived in the centuries following 2500 BC
in several migratory waves from the Rhine- land and Low
Countries, the evidence for this being almost totally from the
graves. The usual method of burial was in a crouched position
in stone-lined pits, called short cists, with accompanying
pottery vessel, which ideally might have contained some potent
drink to cheer the unknown road to death! Other items are
sometimes found in graves, such as flint arrowheads, knives,
scrapers, and more rarely, bronze weapons such as daggers and
flat axes. The interaction of the Beaker people and the
indigenous Neolithic population resulted in the latter
adopting the rite of the single grave burial, but instead of
burying Beakers with the dead, they deposited a type of pot
called a Food Vessel which, like the Beaker, is usually richly
decorated.
During the second half of the second millennium BC, the
production of metal-work flourished. The range of bronze types
included tools such as axes, chisels, and knife-blades, and
weapons such as spearheads, dirks, and rapiers. Early in the
first millennium BC, the sword appears for the first time
among bronze weapons. The bronze objects ploughed up in a
field on Pyotdykes farm, near Dundee, some ten years ago, are
excellent examples of later Bronze Age metalwork. Two swords
and a socketed spearhead with a decorated gold band encircling
the mouth of the socket were recovered. The increase in
manufacture of bronzes was paralleled to some extent by the
growth in the use of gold ornaments. The possession of gold
objects, and to a certain extent metal ones, was probably the
privilege of only a few people, perhaps a chieftain ruling
class, and it would seem that for the first time gold had
become the insignia of wealth and power. If all men were equal
in the Bronze Age, some were more equal than
others.
Unfortunately, we know next to nothing about the
habitation sites of the Bronze Age people: we know a great
deal about their death and burial, very little of how or where
they lived. The converse is true, however, for the later Iron
Age period, where we know of many habitation sites, but few
burial ones. I wonder, however, just how many of the thousands
of people who enjoy the splendid scenery of Tayside are aware
that on the tops of several hills remain the traces of some of
the most impressive monuments of the Scottish Iron Age. These
monuments are known as hill-forts, and were probably defensive
in purpose. An area on the top of hills such as the White
Caterthun, near Edzell or Barry Hill near Alyth, was enclosed
and defended by a rampart and ditch, sometimes by a series of
ramparts and ditches. Sometimes the ramparts were constructed
of e and turf, but more often, in this region, of dry
stonewalling. In a number of cases, the dry built walls of the
forts were held together by a system of bonding timbers so as
to prevent the down-slipping of such a heavy mass. If in such
a wall the timbers caught fire, either accidentally or at the
hands of the enemy, then in certain conditions on the windy
hilltop such a high temperature could be reached as to cause
the stone to melt into slag-like masses. Hill-forts where this
has happened are known as “vitrified forts”. The area enclosed
by these forts varies considerably, and so therefore must the
size of the communities that used them. On Tayside, few
hill-forts exceed five acres in size. Nonetheless, immense
effort and discipline must have been involved in building such
defences and the dwelling huts within them. It has been
estimated that for the vitrified fort at Finavon, in Angus,
250,000 cubic feet of stone and 100,000 cubic feet of timber
must been required.
Few sites have been archaeologically excavated and many
problems remain unresolved; what exactly were these monuments
for? Were they representative of a clan or tribal addiction to
warfare? Were they permanently occupied or temporary defensive
retreats? Archaeological finds amount to just coarse pottery,
the occasional jet ring, and some stone tools which do not
give much clue to cultural affinities or social
organisation.
Economic
life was probably based on stock-breeding, sheep-rearing, and
some arable crop-growing. Occupation of hill-forts, in one
form or another, must have spanned many centuries, probably
from around the seventh century BC to the first centuries AD.
By no means everyone was living in hill-forts at this time.
Many non-fortified settlement sites are known, especially in
the highland glens and with notable examples in Glenshee at
Dalrulzion and Dalnaglar. Sites of this type are generally
circular enclosures constructed of dry stonewalling, and
average about 10 metres in diameter. The excavation of the
enclosures at Dalrulzion yielded evidence of occupation in the
form of hearths and pieces of pottery. On the other hand,
excavation of enclosures at Dalnaglar, situated to the east
across the Shee Water from the Cockstane, yielded no evidence
of human occupation within the enclosures. All finds of a
domestic nature came from outside the walls, so perhaps these
enclosures served as cattle pens.
Whilst taking part in the Clan gathering at the
Cockstane in August, I could not help raising my eyes to look
across the Shee Water and imagining some small Iron Age group
gathering together with all their animals and worldly goods at
the enclosures at Dalnaglar. The thought that over 2000 years
ago people were battling for survival against the elements in
Glenshee never ceases to amaze me; it was all so long ago
-before Picts, Scots, and even MacThomases were thought
of!